In Partnership with The 74

LAUSD sweetens its offer on teacher raises, continues to call for a new category in evaluations to identify highly effective educators

Laura Greanias | September 26, 2018



Superintendent Austin Beutner at his introductory news conference last spring at Belmont High School.

*Updated Sept. 27: After today’s first mediation session, LA Unified announced that the next session is set for Oct. 3.

LA Unified sweetened its salary offer to the teachers union just before Thursday’s first mediation session, but it did not back down on teacher quality demands — including a call for a new category in evaluations to identify highly effective teachers.

The district’s offer was met by outrage from United Teachers Los Angeles, which shows no intention of backing off its threats to strike.

The new offer was approved Tuesday morning in closed session by the school board and made public late Tuesday. The two sides will meet with a mediator Thursday. The teachers have been working without a contract since July 2017. In their last contract, in 2015, they received 10 percent raises. They had not received raises for eight years during the Recession but still received salary boosts based on years of experience and for taking additional educational courses.

• Read more: As LA’s teachers union prepares to strike, here’s something that could be a bigger hang-up than raises: how to identify great teachers

The district is offering 6 percent raises over two years to all teachers. Even though the district faces bankruptcy in three years and has been warned by both the county and the state, LA Unified’s chief financial officer has said 6 percent raises have been factored into this year’s budget and the district can afford them. But other union demands would cost $1.5 billion beyond the raises and can’t be sustained, the district says.

The district’s public statement on its new offer did not include some of its previous negotiation positions, but an email Wednesday from the district’s labor team confirmed that they are still on the table.

Those include adding the new teacher evaluation category and a refusal to cede decision-making authority over conversions to magnet schools, student testing, and principals’ budgets.

• Read more: LAUSD more than doubles new magnets this year, but teachers union calls for contract changes that would halt their growth

If the district decides to drop any of those, the next chance to open negotiations with the union will be when the new contract runs out in July 2020.

The district’s statement said the new offer “provides for a fair pay raise for teachers, additional teachers in high-needs schools, teacher pay aligned with student needs, and increased transparency in the UTLA contract.” It “shows our commitment to helping students most in need,” Superintendent Austin Beutner said, “and creates a pathway for LA Unified and UTLA to avoid a strike that would hurt LA’s most vulnerable students and families.”

In a response posted on Facebook, UTLA called the new offer “a stunning example of disrespect to LAUSD educators and students,” citing salary increases that are “contingent on district finances, increased workload and cuts to salary point opportunities, while also making it more difficult to qualify for secure healthcare in retirement.”

Here’s what the district is offering:

Salary and benefits:

A 6 percent raise over two years, made up of a 3 percent raise retroactive for 2017-18, plus another 3 percent raise for 2018-19. A 6 percent raise would match the raises the district’s other labor unions received this year. On Thursday, the day mediation that began with the teachers union, the district announced it had reached a tentative agreement with the Teamsters, for the same raise as it is offering the teachers.

The district’s previous offer was a 2 percent raise and a 2 percent bonus. The union wants a 6.5 percent raise that would be retroactive to July 1, 2016.

This year’s raise would be contingent on whether the district’s budget report next spring shows positive projected ending balances for 2018-19 and 2019-20.

The proposal also includes a provision for extra work and/or training starting this school year.

Teachers could also earn extra pay for taking courses, but only in areas that the district prioritizes, such as science, the arts, foreign languages, and technical education. Currently, teachers are eligible for pay raises for taking a wide range of classes, something school board members have been repeatedly urging to change.

The requirement for eligibility for health benefits in retirement would increase by two years under the formula that adds up an employee’s age and years of service. This would align with the district’s other employee unions. All eligible retirees and their dependents receive free lifetime health benefits, with no co-pays or premiums.

Class sizes:

The proposal reduces class sizes by four students in core subjects in 15 middle schools and 75 elementary schools. These high-needs schools are determined under a new Student Equity Needs Index. Starting this school year, the schools are also receiving extra funding and a waiver from having to hire teachers off the district’s “must-place” list.

• Read more: LAUSD board frees principals of struggling schools from having to hire teachers sent to them by the district

As Gov. Brown allocates more education funding, LAUSD moves to make sure its neediest schools benefit the most

Contract language transparency:

The district is calling for a summary document in all final contracts that will provide a clear outline for families and the general public “to increase transparency and understanding.”

Katie Braude, executive director of the parent advocacy group Speak UP, called on the district to do more on teacher quality.

“Unfortunately, this contract offer does not do enough to ensure that every student has a quality teacher in front of the classroom,” Braude said. “It would lock us into the status quo for another two years, leaving intact the parts of the contract that value seniority over teacher performance. Teachers and parents agree that regular and meaningful evaluations improve teacher quality and effectiveness. Teachers we work with feel unsupported when they don’t get that regular feedback. Teachers should not go five years without being evaluated, and no school should be forced to hire a teacher against their will. No one benefits from that situation.”


*This article has been updated with the district’s agreement with the Teamsters on Thursday, Sept. 27, and with the next mediation date of Oct 3.

Read Next